top of page

Document 5 - Letter to George McClellan, October 25, 1862

As you analyze the correspondence, please consider the following analytical skills and how you would use the document in your response to the DBQ question.

​

  • Context

  • Audience

  • Point of View

  • Purpose

Majr. Genl. McClellan

 

I have just read your despatch about sore tongued and fatigued horses. Will you pardon me for asking what the horses of your army have done since the battle of Antietam that fatigue anything?

​

A. LINCOLN

October 3, 1862 - Lincoln and McClellan at Antietam

Close Reading

"An early and persistent thorn in Lincoln's side throughout the early portion of the war was General George McClellan. It would be unfair to categorize McClellan as a man without skills; he whipped his men into shape, prepared them relentlessly, and earned their trust. However, McClellan was a disastrous battlefield general marred with indecisiveness and inaction."

"McClellan was a habitual exaggerator, often times he misrepresented the force of Lee’s army by two or three times its actual strength (McPherson 123). He further exaggerated his army’s successes when, after he had found the rebel plans, he botched an early opportunity before Antietam to completely eliminate Lee’s forces... This failure allowed the bloodiest single day of fighting in American history to occur at Antietam, and despite having a numerical advantage, McClellan again did not pursue and refused to chase Lee into Virginia to strike what may have been the decisive blow (Oakes 314). Lincoln visited Antietam in early October to discuss pressing the attack and additionally urged McClellan via correspondence(two weeks before the October 25th letter) by listing the advantages he had over Lee. Almost read as a final plea, he mentioned that McClellan had better roads, an easier path, more soldiers, and sure victory on the horizon (Lincoln). McClellan did not bite and spent much of October encamped and static."

Need more help? See the analysis below.

bottom of page